Pennsylvania non-solicitation agreements: Enforceable with reasonable scope.
Published May 7, 2026
## Non-solicitation agreements in Pennsylvania
Non-solicits are a less-restrictive cousin of non-competes. Where a **non-compete** prevents an ex-employee from working for a competitor at all, a **non-solicit** prevents them from soliciting specific people — usually customers, employees, or both.
### Pennsylvania enforceability
Enforceable with reasonable scope.
## Two main types of non-solicits
**Customer non-solicit:**
- Prohibits soliciting / accepting business from former employer's customers
- Often defined as customers the employee worked with personally
- Or all customers within a defined territory
- Or those known to be customers
**Employee non-solicit (anti-poaching):**
- Prohibits poaching the former employer's employees
- Sometimes "recruit, hire, or solicit"
- Often defined to apply only to specific roles or seniority levels
## Why non-solicits are usually more enforceable than non-competes
- They DON'T prohibit working in the industry — only specific contacts
- They protect a clear legitimate business interest (relationships)
- Less harm to the employee's livelihood
- Many states that ban non-competes still allow non-solicits
- Even California (which voids most non-competes) still recognizes non-solicits in narrower forms (trade-secret protection)
## What courts look at for enforceability
Same reasonableness factors as non-competes:
1. **Legitimate business interest** — customer relationships, training investment, confidential information
2. **Duration** — typically 6-24 months reasonable; longer is suspect
3. **Scope** — must be tied to customers / employees the departing employee actually worked with or had information about
4. **Geography** — appropriate to where the business operates
5. **Hardship to the employee** — should not bar earning a living
6. **Public interest**
## California — the AMN Healthcare problem
California's Edwards v. Arthur Andersen (2008) and AMN Healthcare v. Aya Healthcare (2018) effectively voided most employee non-solicits in CA — treating them as restraints on employee mobility prohibited by Bus. & Prof. § 16600. Customer non-solicits in CA are generally void unless protecting trade secrets.
California is now functionally a NO-non-solicit state, except for narrow trade-secret-based protection.
## What's typically NOT covered
- **Passive marketing** — running general advertising that may reach old customers
- **Customers who initiate contact** — generally allowed in many states ("do not solicit" doesn't mean "can't accept")
- **Personal contacts predating employment** — friends and family who happened to become customers
- **Public bidding** for government contracts
- **Indirect contact via intermediaries** — sometimes
Read your specific clause carefully — many specifically prohibit accepting business from former customers, not just initiating contact.
## Garden leave alternatives
Some employers structure restrictions as **garden leave** — paying the employee during the restricted period. This:
- Avoids the "unreasonable hardship" defense
- Increases enforceability
- Costs the employer money, so they choose carefully who to apply it to
## What gets enforced
- **Cease-and-desist letter** to former employee + new employer
- **Temporary restraining order (TRO)** — fast preliminary relief
- **Preliminary injunction** — longer-lasting relief during litigation
- **Damages** — typically lost profits, sometimes statutory penalties
- **Attorney's fees** — if contract provides
- **Tortious interference** claims against new employer
## What employees should do
**Before signing:**
- Read it carefully
- Negotiate scope, duration, geography
- Get carve-outs for personal contacts
- Consider exit pay / garden-leave provisions
**Before leaving:**
- Read your agreement (find a copy)
- Get advice on what's enforceable in your jurisdiction
- Don't take customer lists or contacts to new job
- Don't recruit colleagues before leaving
- Document business contacts independently of employer's CRM
- Time the move carefully (some states require employer-initiated separation)
**After leaving:**
- Don't initiate contact with former customers in restricted period
- Don't recruit former colleagues
- Document any contact initiated by them
- Be ready to respond to cease-and-desist letters
## What employers should do
- **Tailor the agreement** — boilerplate is weak
- **Use specific definitions** of customers / employees covered
- **Reasonable durations** — 6-24 months
- **Provide consideration** — beyond at-will employment in some states
- **Track customer relationships** in CRM so you can prove access
- **Document confidential information** that justifies the restriction
- **Send timely notice** when an employee leaves
- **Move quickly** if violation suspected — TROs require speed
## What you should do
If you're being asked to sign a non-solicit, leaving a job with one, or trying to enforce one in Pennsylvania: get an employment-law attorney's review. Most Pennsylvania employment attorneys offer paid initial consultations. Drafting and litigation are both highly state-specific.
---
*This guide is general information about Pennsylvania law as of early 2026 and is not legal advice. Non-solicit law has been heavily reformed in many states. Talk to a licensed Pennsylvania employment attorney about your specific situation.*
This guide is for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws change and outcomes depend on your specific situation — talk to a licensed attorney before acting on anything you read here.